Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Pulling v. Pollard et al
as 1:2020cv00970
Defendant:
T. Valdez, B. Hedrick, N. Bourdlales and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pulling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al
as 20-55571
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SPENCER, C.O.; HCA - D1 Escort 3, individual and official capacity, D. HENRY, C.O.; D1 - floor 2 - EOP, individual and official capacity, E. ENGLAND, C.O.; D1 - ESCRT-2, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE DIAZ
Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al
as 20-55516
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SPENCER, C.O.; HCA - D1 Escort 3, individual and official capacity, D. HENRY, C.O.; D1 - floor 2 - EOP, individual and official capacity, E. ENGLAND, C.O.; D1 - ESCRT-2, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE DIAZ
Darren Harris v. Jerry Brown et.al.
as 2:2018cv10349
Defendant:
I Mijares, Kathleen Allison, E Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone White v. W. Reaume, et al
as 18-55570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE ALI WHITE, AKA T. White
Defendant - Appellee:
W. REAUME, Lt., in their individual capacity and G. QUINONEZ, Correctional Officer, in their individual capacity
Felipe Polanco Diaz v. Reaume et al
as 2:2018cv01982
Defendant:
C.O. A. Ademoye, C.O. A. Ademoye, Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Polanco Diaz
Alexander v. Strohmaier et al
as 2:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Alexander
Defendant:
B. Strohmaier, W. Reaume and D. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T. White v. W. Reaume et al
as 2:2016cv07116
Defendant:
G. Quinonez and W. Reaume
Plaintiff:
T. White
Michael Mootry v. J. Wiard et al
as 2:2014cv05220
Defendant:
J. Batrez, K. Bell, W. Castellano and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mootry
Guzman A Roddy v. Jeffrey Beard et al
as 2:2013cv06907
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Beard, Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Guzman A Roddy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
