Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gregory Richardson v. W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
as 5:2021cv00830
Defendant:
Clerk of Superior Court and W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv09130
Defendant:
ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Librarians and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Brian Fortner v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2015cv01372
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Does and W Samuel Hamrick, Jr
Plaintiff:
Brian Fortner
Anaeme v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01768
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , Allied Security Holdings, L.L.C., AlliedBarton Security Services, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Freitag v. United States District Court Southern District of California et al
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
John Freitag
Defendant:
United States District Court Southern District of California , Edward J. Schwartz and W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. United States District Court, Southern District of California et al
as 3:2011cv01680
Plaintiff:
Lewis Anderson
Defendant:
United States District Court, Southern District of California and W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners et al
as 3:2010cv01409
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners, W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr, VAMC San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, FBI, NSA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Judge Whelan, Judge Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
