Cases 1 - 6 of 6
QSL Waco, Inc. et al v. Lube Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
QSL Waco, Inc. and QSL Realty Waco, Inc.
Defendant:
Lube Holdings, Inc. , Quaker Steak & Lube Franchising Corporation and John Longstreet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 6:2012mc00005
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Douglass, Scott P. Douglass, Samuel K. Douglass and others
Receiver:
Fernando M. Bustos
Defendant:
John William Beakley, Mary Adams Beakley, Meghan Beakley and others
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 3:2012cv01760
Plaintiff:
Timothy K Douglass , Scott P Douglass , Samuel K Douglass and others
Defendant:
Mary Adams Beakley , Meghan Beakley , David Janson Beakley and others
Receiver:
Fernando M Bustos
Intervenor:
DeAnn M. Miller , Walter C. Miller , Wayne Miller and others
Movant:
Diversified Real Estate, LLC , Highlands Bank , Textron Financial Corporation and others
Creditor:
AIMBANK , The Highlands Bank of Dallas , George Porter and others
Claimant:
Colorado County Central Appraisal District , Lamb County Appraisal District , Lee County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 5:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy K Douglass , Scott P Douglass , Samuel K Douglass and others
Defendant:
Mary Adams Beakley , Meghan Beakley , David Janson Beakley and others
Receiver:
Fernando M Bustos
Intervenor:
DeAnn M. Miller , Walter C. Miller , Wayne Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Wingrove v. Texas Rodco Waco, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00092
Defendant:
Ricky Martinez and Texas Rodco Waco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sarah Wingrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KHAN v. ROUNDTABLE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED KHAN
Defendant:
ROUNDTABLE CORPORATION, JOHN W. BEAKLEY, RCDQ BLOOMINGTON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
