Cases 51 - 60 of 213
REICHERT et al v. CARLSON BROS., INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00236
Defendant:
CARLSON BROS., INC., LONNIE CROWELL, MASONRY, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY REICHERT and THERESA REICHERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02948
Plaintiff:
CHASIDY MADDEN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARNELL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2016cv02754
Plaintiff:
JOYCE DARNELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WITT v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02565
Defendant:
WAL-MART #1665, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and others
Plaintiff:
TERESA A. WITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
Starisha Anderson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michaels v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Michaels
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Mediator:
Michael D Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRELL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
MELINDA MURRELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORE NO. 1728, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Waltz v. Wal-Mart Store of Auburn, Indiana et al
as 1:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brenda Waltz
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store of Auburn, Indiana , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
