Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Walgreen Co. v. Haseotes et al
as 4:2024cv10151
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreens
Defendant:
Aristedes Haseotes and Byron Haseotes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walgreen Co. v. Haseotes et al
as 1:2024cv10151
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Aristedes Haseotes and Byron Haseotes
Hyland v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2023cv15668
Plaintiff:
Jake Hyland
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Walgreen Co. v. Aktive Health, LLC
as 1:2023mi00103
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Aktive Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Jeske et al v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2023cv81122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Jeske and Jan M. Jeske
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Pifzer, Sanofi and others
In re: Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023mc00339
In Re:
Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
Petitioner:
Walgreen Co., Kroger Co., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC. and others
Respondent:
TruPharma LLC
Wakefield v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
Rachel Wakefield
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jeske et al v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 1:2023cv10766
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Jeske and Jan M. Jeske
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Pifzer, Sanofi and others
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
