Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adjal et al v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01123
Plaintiff:
Mahieddine Adjal , Krista Edwards , Joseph D'Amico and others
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. , Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Walgreens, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Walgreens
as 3:2011mc00075
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Walgreens
Cause Of Action: Application to Enter Premises
Type:
Other Statutes
Kern v. Heimerdinger et al
as 3:2009cv01000
Plaintiff:
Richard Kern
Defendant:
Christian N. Heimerdinger, Orlando Ramos-Cabera, Frank Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
