Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Action Chemical, Inc. v. Bean Information Technology Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02789
Plaintiff:
Action Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Bean Information Technology Corporation, Edmond Wang and John Nystrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BMA GLOBAL VENTURES LLC v. JINAN GOLD PHOENIX BRAKE SYSTEMS CO. LTD et al
as 2:2020cv02510
Defendant:
SUN WEIHUA, SHANDONG GOLD PHOENIX CO. LTD., JOEY WANG and others
Plaintiff:
BMA GLOBAL VENTURES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agrawal v. Wang
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Hui Wang and Elson Wang
Plaintiff:
Anil K Agrawal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Music City Metals Co., Inc. v. Cai et al
as 3:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Music City Metals Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Jingchang Cai, Yin Hailin, Highot Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dixon v. Wang et al
as 3:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Esther F. Dixon
Defendant:
Qiangguo Wang, Stevens Transport, Inc. and Paragon Leasing L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang et al v. Wilhite et al
as 3:2016cv02073
Plaintiff:
Junhan Wang , Wei Li and Gabriel Li
Defendant:
Thomas S. Wilhite, Plumrose USA, Inc. and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sarver et al v. Wang et al
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Henry D. Sarver and Pamela K. Sarver
Defendant:
Ming Wang and Wang Vision Institute, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Kong Chef Wang, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00611
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Kong Chef Wang, Inc., Kong Xian Wang, M & W Restaurant, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LaValley et al v. Wang Vision Institute, PLLC et al
as 3:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
Christina LaValley and United States of America
Defendant:
Wang Vision Institute, PLLC and Ming Xu Wang, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
