Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Gene Cooper, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6107
Petitioner:
GENE TONY COOPER, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
John Alexander v. Jonathan Nance
as 23-7071
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Respondent / Appellee:
JONATHAN NANCE, Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cooper v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Gene Tony Cooper, Jr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Burnett v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6113
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES L. BURNETT
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON and WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Thomas Thompson v. Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 22-6752
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Whaley v. South Carolina
as 4:2020cv04366
Petitioner:
James C. Whaley
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution and South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marlon Rivera v. Warden Tyger River
as 17-7369
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLON RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Rivera v. Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 5:2017cv02011
Petitioner:
Marlon Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
