Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,467
Thompson v. City of New York
as 24-1051
Plaintiff: EON THOMPSON
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Mayor of New York City, CYNTHIA BRANN, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Correction and others
Antrobus v. OBCC Warden
as 24-1054
Petitioner: ANDRE ANTROBUS
Respondent: WARDEN OF OBCC RIKERS ISLAND
Iotova v. Metropolitan Detention Center
as 24-1048
Petitioner: ANTOANETA IOTOVA
Respondent: Warden HERMAN E. QUAY, Unit Manager MYRNA BRIDGES, Officer KEISHA SPIVEY and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant: JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner: John Yung
Respondent: NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Antrobus v. Warden of OBCC Rikers Island
as 24-920
Petitioner: ANDRE ANTROBUS
Respondent: WARDEN OF OBCC RIKERS ISLAND
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff: Umar Alli
Defendant: Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Harvey et al
as 1:2024cv02714
Plaintiff: Mr. Brandon L. Griffith
Defendant: Warden Mrs. Harvey, Captain Payne, C.O. DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nazer v. Manhattan District Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02713
Petitioner: Izzat Nazer
Respondent: Manhattan District Attorney and Warden at Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdes v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff: Jorge Valdes
Defendant: Jesus Guadarrama and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?