Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,477
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff: JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant: CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Sanchez v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01251
Petitioner: Willy Sanchez
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pronto v. Warden
as 24-357
Respondent: WARDEN, WARDEN and Ward
Petitioner: DARREN SCOTT PRONTO
Kelley v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff: Chamar Kelley
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00867
Petitioner: Daryl Williams
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons, Warden Jessica Sage and BoP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamoureaux v. Stover
as 24-272
Petitioner / Appellant: DONALD WAYNE LAMOUREAUX
Respondent / Appellee: R. STOVER, Warden of FCI Danbury, in his official capacity
Ray v. Jamison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner: Joseph Ray
Respondent: Warden Jamal Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Government for the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff: Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant: Government for the State of New York and Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Petitioner: Jerome Noble
Respondent: Carter, P.O. Santiago, Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner: Jerome Noble
Respondent: Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?