Cases 21 - 30 of 444
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Albert Thomas, III
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rafael Jones
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coplen v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Darrin Walker
Respondent:
Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petrey v. Mazza, et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
William Royal Petrey
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Supreme Court of Kentucky, Kentucky Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
