Cases 21 - 30 of 525
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whalen v. Lue
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Archie Whalen
Defendant:
Warden D. Lue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Albert Thomas, III
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rafael Jones
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coplen v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cope v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, Warden Amy Robey, Deputy Security Patricia Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
