Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Demontre Spriggs v. Lieutenant Vincent
as 26-6823
Plaintiff:
DEMONTRE ANTONIO SPRIGGS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT VINCENT, CAPTAIN MCCAULEY, SERGEANT TRAVIS, SR. and others
Rodney Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis
as 26-6638
Plaintiff:
RODNEY M. POWELL
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF SGT. DAVIS, OFFICER LOGAN, WARDEN ANDERSON and others
Arroyo v. Anderson DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. FILE IN CASE #2:25CV450.
as 2:2025cv00714
Petitioner:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Respondent:
Warden Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Anderson et al
as 7:2025cv00225
Plaintiff:
Eric Owen Parker
Defendant:
Warden Anderson, Capt. Franklin, Unit Manager Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00853
Defendant:
C/O Robertson, Unit Manager Collins, Warden Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Owen Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Defour v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00472
Defendant:
Investigator Stanley, Special Agent Acosta, Sergeant Steffey and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Loggin, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Brinegar et al
as 7:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
M. Brinegar, Sergeant Towler, Sergeant Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
