Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Defour v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00472
Defendant:
Investigator Stanley, Special Agent Acosta, Sergeant Steffey and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Loggin, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Brinegar et al
as 7:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
M. Brinegar, Sergeant Towler, Sergeant Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Barr et al
as 7:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Israel Ray Cooper
Defendant:
C/O Barr, Sgt. Evans, Lt. Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Braxton v. Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
as 22-7232
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ANDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Charles Carter v. Correctional Officer Cole
as 22-6417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. POWERS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. RUTLEDGE and others
LeBlanc v. Anderson et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Major Chase, Warden Anderson and Major Farmer
Plaintiff:
Michael C LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Barefoot et al
as 3:2020cv01433
Defendant:
Off Barefoot, Warden Anderson and Barefoot
Plaintiff:
Michael Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
