Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv03598
Petitioner:
THEODORE BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. MALOUF et al
as 1:2009cv02117
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALOUF
Defendant:
DR. TURNER, DR. LOPES, MR. SPOULDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2008cv04811
Petitioner:
ASTOLFO TORRES
Respondent:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Antonelli v. Crow et al
as 6:2008cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael C. Antonelli
Respondent:
Brad Crow, Jeff Hammond, Warden Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHAW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv03570
Petitioner:
LAMAR SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRICE v. WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2008cv02968
Petitioner:
GREGORY TRICE
Respondent:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LUGO-VAZQUEZ v. WARDEN GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv00986
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUGO-VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. WARDEN GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv00892
Petitioner:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY, PHARMACY DEPARTMENT FORT DIX WEST, CENTRAL OFFICE MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Juan Suarez v. Warden Grondolsky
as 08-5099
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN SUAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN GRONDOLSKY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
