Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Renaldo Robichaw v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 23-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENALDO MCPERCY ROBICHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, HSA, JANE DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC, KALLE BAXLEY, PSP, PEDRO ALDEBOL, PSP and others
Pascal Gedeon v. Attorney General, et al
as 22-3450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Marcellas Hoffman v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 22-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCELLAS HOFFMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Victor Clayton v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 21-1789
Petitioner:
VICTOR CLAYTON
Respondent:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 21-1010
Respondent:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Petitioner:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 20-1359
Respondent:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Petitioner:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Robert Reed v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2926
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Tashaun Sutton v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TASHAUN SUTTON, AKA Anthony Lynch
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Wilbert Proffitt v. Warden Philadelphia FDC
as 19-2102
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILBERT EUGENE PROFFITT, 73 YEARS OLD, CASE 47 YEARS OLD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
