Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner:
MARK WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shafer v. United States District Court for the Northern District (2nd Cir.) of New York
as 3:2023cv01092
Petitioner:
Joshua Shafer
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District (2nd Cir.) of New York and Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons and Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01678
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Warden USP Allenwood, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROGERS v. WARDEN, U.S.P. CANAAN
as 1:2020cv01257
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray-Bryan Rogers
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wheeler v. Bradley
as 4:2019cv01445
Petitioner:
Eric Wheeler
Respondent:
E. Bradley and Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wall v. Warden, USP - Canaan
as 3:2018cv01220
Petitioner:
Mitchell Wall
Respondent:
Warden, USP - Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. WARDEN, USP CANAAN
as 3:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
JOHN A. SMITH
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
