Cases 21 - 30 of 277
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Daker v. Adams
as 1:2022cv02776
Petitioner:
Waseem Daker
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Daker v. Adams
as 6:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Waseem Daker
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Warden Smith State Prison
as 22-11649
Petitioner / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
