Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. 273,624.60 SQUARE FEET OF LAND et al
as 1:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
MAZZA FAMILY FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS LLC, JOHN W. RIDENOUR, III, LINDA A. RIDENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. 6,627 SQUARE FEET OF LAND et al
as 1:2021cv01753
Defendant:
6,627 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (KNOWN AS 2506 28TH STREET NE), NORTHEAST IRON WORKS LAND PARTNERSHIP, NORTHEAST IRON WORKS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. 5,255 SQUARE FEET OF LAND et al
as 1:2021cv01743
Defendant:
RYAN A. RIEL, DC OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE, 5,255 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (KNOWN AS 2504 28TH STREET NE) and others
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. 7,360 SQUARE FEET OF LAND et al
as 1:2021cv01757
Defendant:
DC OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE, 2510 BLADENSBURG ROAD LLC, TASTY KABOB AND GYRO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 119,593 Square Feet (2.7455 Acres) of Land, More or Less, Situate in Landover, Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv03468
Defendant:
Landover Beverage Realty LLC, 119,593 Square Feet (2.7455 Acres) of Land, More or Less, Situate in Landover, Prince George's County, Maryland, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 895, 286 Square Feet (20.55 Acres) of Land, More or Less, Situated in Landover, Prince George's County Maryland
as 8:2020cv02165
Defendant:
WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY, FLORANATION, LLC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION and others
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 331,043 Square Feet (7.5997 Acres) of Land, More or Less, Situate in Landover, Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv02163
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, A MARYLAND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION, 331,043 SQUARE FEET (7.5997 ACRES) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN LANDOVER, PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND; and others
Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 6,212 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of Alexandria, Virginia et al
as 1:2019cv00416
Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Defendant:
6,212 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of Alexandria, Virginia and Potomac Greens Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 47,611 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of Alexandria, Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv01542
Defendant:
Old Town Greens Condominium Unit Owners Association, 47,611 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of Alexandria, Virginia and Old Town Greens Townhome Owners Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Benjamin Jackson, LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 8:2018cv01058
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jackson, LLC
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority , Unknown Owners of the Property: 0 Swann Place Suitland, Maryland 20746, Prince George's County, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
