Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02452
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00205
Plaintiff:
Robin L. Watkins
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mechanical Contractors Association of Memphis, Inc. et al v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv02047
Plaintiff:
White Plumbing & Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Morgan & Thornburg, Inc. and Mechanical Contractors Association of Memphis, Inc.
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 1-15, Shelby County, Tennessee and Carolyn S. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gooch et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv01257
Defendant:
Ann Grant, Billy Barron, Cindy Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Gooch and Doris M. Partee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2018cv02470
Defendant:
Kathyrn Watkins, State of Tennessee, Michael House and others
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uhles v. Housel et al
as 3:2018cv00622
Defendant:
Deborah M. Housel, Montey Watkins and Glenn Funk
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Uhles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Watkins v. Tipton County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2018cv02289
Plaintiff:
Thelma A. Watkins
Defendant:
Tipton County Sheriff Office and Saemenes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Fayette County Schools et al
as 2:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Schools, Marlon King, Nekita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Henry County Jail
as 1:2017cv01210
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Long, Elijah J. Wood, Rock A. Foster and others
Defendant:
Henry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv02803
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Sharell Watkins
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
