Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Pevia v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Pevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corr Wayne Hill, G. Warren, Warden, R. Roderick, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurel v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mitch Aurel and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Larry Hogan, Wayne Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Pevia, Jr. v. Gregory Werner
as 22-6103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RAY PEVIA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY WERNER, Assistant Warden, WAYNE HILL, former Commissioner of Correction, RICHARD RODERICK and others
Davis v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv02740
Plaintiff:
Vonell Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Wayne Hill, Ms. Maria Maxino-Sabundayo, Mr. Vernan Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Michael Hill v. Michael Revells
as 21-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS
Kindall Neale v. Lawrence Hogan
as 21-7287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINDALL NEALE
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor of Maryland, BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor, ROBERT L. GREEN, Secretary of Public Safety and others
Jeffrey Corporal v. Warden Weber
as 21-7120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CORPORAL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WEBER, BUTLER, ARNOLD and others
Jeffrey Corporal v. Warden Weber
as 21-6764
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WEBER, BUTLER, ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CORPORAL
Jeffrey Corporal v. Acting Assistant Warden Butler
as 21-6437
Defendant / Appellee:
CCMSII JOSEPH R. JEFCOAT, LT. SMITH, CCMS CORY M. C/O WALKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CORPORAL
Interested Party:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dorsey v. Hogan et al
as 1:2021cv00721
Defendant:
Greg Warner, Robin Woolford, Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
