Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
RODGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00892
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00653
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Admin and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01449
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RODGERS et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv81031
Plaintiff:
MARGARET RODGERS and WAYNE RODGERS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, DANA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODGERS et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv67164
Plaintiff:
TERRY WAYNE RODGERS and JOANN M. RODGERS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Terry Wayne Rodgers, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:09-CV-00103
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Rodgers et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Rodgers and Joann M. Rodgers
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
