Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wayne Scott v. Santa Monica Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv06374
Plaintiff:
Mr. Wayne Scott and Wayne Scott
Defendant:
Santa Monica Police Department, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Alejandro Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Witkin v. Lotersztain et al
as 2:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Neil Largoza, Wayne Scott, Martin Kuersten and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robichaud et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03757
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robichaud , Ronald Rogers , Mary Rogers and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Hatten
as 1:2016cv00599
Petitioner:
Roger Wayne Scott
Respondent:
S. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Hatten
as 2:2016cv00839
Petitioner:
Roger Wayne Scott
Respondent:
S. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wayne Stewart v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72670
:
In re: WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Petitioner:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
E. VILLANUEVA, Correctional Officer, ISAAC MIJARES, Correctional Lieutenant, JAMES VARELA, Program Sergeant and others
Wayne Stewart v. M. McDonald
as 11-55319
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD
Wayne Stewart v. M. McDonald
as 11-55209
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD, Warden
Wayne Stewart v. J. Sullivan, et al
as 08-56727
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
J. W. SULLIVAN, Warden and JERRY BROWN, The Attorney General of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
