Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COLEY v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2015cv00159
Defendant:
JEFFREY BUTTS, METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP, WAYNE TOWNSHIP SCHOOL BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY COLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Wayne Township Road District et al
as 1:2013cv06736
Plaintiff:
Linda Wood
Defendant:
Wayne Township Road District and Martin McManamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATKOVIC v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
MARK MATKOVIC
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP and SANDERS SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
