Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Marion Cherry et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01745
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charlotte Cherry and Marion Cherry
The: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Jack Keyian et al v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv10784
Defendant: 3M Company, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Jack Keyian and Penny Keyian
La Pointe et al v. Asbeka Industries Of New York Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06272
Plaintiff: Herbert La Pointe and Ann La Pointe
Defendant: Asbeka Industries Of New York Inc., Beazer East Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LYAUTEY et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv84922
Defendant: STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY COMPANY, INC., STONE and others
Plaintiff: GALE LYAUTEY and PATRICIA LYAUTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyautey et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv22891
Defendant: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Elliott Turbomachinery Company, Inc., Stone and others
Plaintiff: Gale Lyautey and Patricia Lyautey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DYER et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv63298
Plaintiff: JERRY DYER, JERRY DYER, JERRY DYER and others
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALUE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
VAWTER et al v. ALFA LAVAL INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87203
Plaintiff: JOHN W VAWTER, JOHN W VAWTER, ERNESTINE VAWTER and others
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Vawter et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 3:2008cv02426
Plaintiff: John W Vawter, John W Vawter, Ernestine Vawter and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval Inc, Anchor Darling Valve Company, Armstrong International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Jerry Dyer et al v. Alfa Laval et al
as 2:2007cv07959
Plaintiff: Jerry Dyer, Jerry Dyer, Jerry Dyer and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval, Inc., Anchor Darling Value Company, Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?