Contract Cases filed in Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sea Brim Condominium Association v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv05810
Plaintiff: Sea Brim Condominium Association
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company and Doe Insurance Companies 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Westport by the Sea Phase III Condominium Owners Association v. West American Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05645
Plaintiff: Westport by the Sea, Phase III Condominium Owners Association and Westport by the Sea Phase III Condominium Owners Association
Defendant: West American Insurance Company, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Ohio Security Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Northgate Plaza Homeowners Association v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00509
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company and Doe Insurance Companies 1-10
Plaintiff: Northgate Plaza Homeowners Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Queen Anne North Homeowners Association et al v. Allstate Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00104
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company and Doe Insurance Companies 1-10
Plaintiff: Benjamin Ober, Queen Anne North Homeowners Association, Ruth Christiansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Quarterdeck Condominium Association of Apartment Owners v. Safeco Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00999
Plaintiff: Quarterdeck Condominium Association of Apartment Owners
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company, Diamond State Insurance Company, Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Nautica Condominium Owners Associaiton v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01788
Plaintiff: Nautica Condominium Owners Association
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company , Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy Nos EQ032763, EQ032764, and 46-7500057326-S-00 , Hartford Fire Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Yakima Air Terminal McAllister Field We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03021
Plaintiff: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant: Yakima Air Terminal - McAllister Field , City of Yakima and County of Yakima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00160
Plaintiff: The Wattles Company
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company, Verlan Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
The Wattles Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv05097
Plaintiff: The Wattles Company
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company , Verlan Fire Insurance Company , Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Evanston Insurance Company et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00923
Plaintiff: Evanston Insurance Company, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Royal Insurance Company of America, Royal Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?