Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tamara Eichelberger v. Mary Hudson-McKinney et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Tamara Eichelberger and Dr Tamara Eichelberger
Defendant:
Mary Hudson-McKinney, Western University of Health Sciences, Dr Mary Hudson-McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Erik Natkin, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 17-72821
:
In re: ERIK NATKIN, M.D., DO PC and ERIK NATKIN, M.D., DO
Petitioner:
ERIK NATKIN, M.D., DO PC, a Utah corporation and ERIK NATKIN, M.D., DO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, an Illinois corporation, OSTEOPATHIC POSTDOCTORIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, OPTI-WEST EDUCATIONAL CONSORTIUM, a California corporation, GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL CORVALLIS, an Oregon corporation, AKA Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07681
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dr. Erik Natkin, DO PC v. American Osteopathic Association et al
as 3:2016cv01494
Defendant:
Albany General Hospital, American Osteopathic Association, Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis and others
Unknown:
Anna R Buono, John R Tate, Anna R Buono and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Erik Natkin, DO PC and Dr. Eric Natkin, DO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04956
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
