Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lively v. Westfall
as 1:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Westfall, Betsy Jividen and Record Clerk
Petitioner:
Mark Leslie Lively
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Westfall et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Phil Huff, Cleve Westfall, Jasmine Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin C. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Salem Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Harold Loyld Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Cheryl Burks and Mary Westfall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. May et al
as 2:2013cv33004
Plaintiff:
Keith W.R. Lowe
Defendant:
Sandra May, Doctor Shoaf, Anna Kincaid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Villers et al
as 2:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamont Redmond
Defendant:
Scott Villers, Jim Rubenstein, Kim May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lawrence Peterson
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Scott Villers, Kim May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
John Jink Lynch
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, John Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01075
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
