Cases 31 - 40 of 169
BOYD v. WEXFORD MEDICAL et al
as 1:2021cv01978
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. BOYD
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL and WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL FAC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MODESITT v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv01711
Plaintiff:
CHAD MODESITT
Defendant:
JULIA MONK, GEO GROUP INC., JESSICA DILLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01465
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDER-HEALTH CARE SERVICES, LT. STORMS and WARDEN MARK SEVIER
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv01150
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, GEO GROUP INC., H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MCINTYRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAVARRETE et al v. PRIMEAU et al
as 2:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SAVAGE and TYLER NAVARRETE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL RIEHEART, WEXFORD MEDICAL and JOANNA PRIMEAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Dennis Hood, Lawrence Machin, Dianne Malfese and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Daryl Antonio Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00573
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, J. FRENCH, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MCINTYRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRENCE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00135
Defendant:
FRANCO, I. RANDOLPH, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHELBY TORRENCE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. ROARK et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Defendant:
J. LUNDY, ROARK, DOROGUCHE and others
Plaintiff:
OLIVER H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogarty v. Wexford Medical Services et al
as 3:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Patel, John Galipeau, Jason Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Normand Fogarty
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
