Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Conway v. Wexford Medical Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Chad Conway
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Sources Inc., IDOC Medical Director, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bryant
Defendant:
Riliwan Ojelade, Vipin Shah, Mohammed Siddiqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUZIER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICKERY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2020cv00566
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, MICHEAL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY VICKERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Wexford Medical Source et al
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
C/O Korte, Sgt. Migneren, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. HOBSON et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, ESTHER HINTON, KIM HOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2017cv04239
Plaintiff:
Johnny English
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Medical Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jones
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Christine Brown, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M. Stewart
Defendant:
Suzann Bailey, John Baldwin, Ty Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Forshey et al
as 3:2017cv03024
Plaintiff:
Clarence Benny Hardy
Defendant:
. Forshey, Spyker, Wexford Medical Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
