Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HURST et al v. JARDEN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv03857
Plaintiff:
SANDRA HURST, ROBERT HURST, SERENA B. HILL-WHITEFIELD and others
Defendant:
JARDEN CORPORATION, NEWELL BRANDS, INC., SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
WHITEFIELD v. GREENWALT et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
ALFRED WHITEFIELD
Defendant:
GREENWALT, MINDY ANDRETTI, SUPERINTENDANT MICHEAL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEFIELD v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 2:2021cv01384
Plaintiff:
ANDREA WHITEFIELD
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitefield v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITEFIELD v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY WHITEFIELD
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITEFIELD et al v. WHITEFIELD et al
as 2:2009cv84700
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. WHITEFIELD, JAMES R. WHITEFIELD, DOROTHY WHITEFIELD and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WHITEFIELD et al v. WHITEFIELD et al
as 2:2009cv84699
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. WHITEFIELD, JR., WILLIAM P. WHITEFIELD, JR., JAMES R. WHITEFIELD and others
Defendant:
DOROTHY WHITEFIELD, DOROTHY WHITEFIELD, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WHITE et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66318
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. WHITE, WILLIAM P. WHITEFIELD, JR., JAMES R. WHITEFIELD and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
