Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Hooli v. Combs et al
as 8:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Basavaraj Hooli
Defendant:
Todd Combs, NationalGeneral Insurance Heathrow, Longen Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wiggins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02956
Plaintiff:
Taurus Antonio Wiggins
Defendant:
United States of America, William D. Quarles, Jr, Christine Marie Celest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. USA - 2255
as 1:2022cv02270
Petitioner:
Taurus Antonio Wiggins
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jeffries v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Reginald Jeffries
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot Management Company, LLC, The Home Depot #2501 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wiggins v. USA-2255
as 1:2021cv02844
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Wiggins
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eugene Scalia v. WW Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03646
Defendant:
Nea Wiggins, WW Contractors, Inc. and WW Contractors, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia and Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Wiggins v. Baltimore County Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv02331
Plaintiff:
Keith Wiggins
Defendant:
Baltimore County Detention Center and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
