Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Union Block Associates LLC et al v. Keane et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
UNION BLOCK ASSOCIATES LLC and Kenneth G. Howell
Defendant:
Tim Keane, Carl Madsen, City of Boise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Mattinas v. Portland Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Bertie Mattinas
Defendant:
Portland Police Department, State of Idaho, Rich Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belue v. Jordanson, et al.
as 1:2021cv00475
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dwaine Belue
Defendant:
Ashley Jordanson, Brian Nichols and Charlee Block Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Freund, et al.
as 2:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Other unknown Owners of Lot 8 in Block 3of Baylen View Estates according to the Plat thereof, filed in Book 2 of Plats at Page 105, records of Bonner County, Idaho, Liying Zahng-Freund, Joseph A. Freund and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Smith
Stoddard v. 2019 Batch of C-Block C/O's and Staff
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Lt. Mertan, Dept. Inf. of Staffing, David Michael Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Idaho State Correction Center et al
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Jay Christensen, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hawkins v. Idaho Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Idaho Board of Corrections, Keith Yordy, Christianson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uhl v. H & R Block
as 1:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Aaron Uhl
Defendant:
H&R Block Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Block v. State of Idaho
as 1:2012cv00440
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Petitioner:
Brandon Block
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
