Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Condon et al v. Town of Brookfield et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Mattie Condon and Jaden Losada
Defendant:
Town of Brookfield, Brookfield Police Department, Brookfield Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart-Purcell v. QKH Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Jacquetta Stewart-Purcell
Defendant:
QKH Enterprises, LLC and Mitchell Wayne Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Purcell v. Scient Federal Credit Union Split Dollar Agreement Plan et al
as 3:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
David Purcell
Defendant:
Scient Federal Credit Union Split Dollar Agreement Plan and Scient Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Purcell v. Hales Court Housing, LLC
as 3:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Jessica Purcell
Defendant:
Hales Court Housing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Purcell v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01187
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
John Purcell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Lemire v. Alfred Benesch & Company, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01724
Defendant:
Alfred Benesch & Company, LLC, South Coast Development, LLC, Alfred Benesch & Company, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bethany Lemire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pressman v. Purcell
as 3:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
Robert Pressman
Defendant:
Anna G. Purcell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purcell v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01616
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Judith Purcell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tomz Corporation v. Hythe Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Tomz Corporation
Defendant:
Hythe Holdings, Inc. , Astura Medical and Thomas Purcell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
v. Tomz Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01366
Defendant:
Tomz Corporation, Hythe Holdings, Inc., Astura Medical and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
