Cases 1 - 10 of 1,585
Lowman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Steven Lowman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reifschneider v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
Steven Reifschneider
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02868
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Monte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Steven Christopher Monte, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Van Horne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02811
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Van Horne
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCullom v. Newark Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. McCullom
Defendant:
Newark Police Department, Officer Alex Colles, Officer Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crabtree v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Steven Crabtree
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02503
Plaintiff:
Steven Ross
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dalton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
Steven Dalton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevens v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Stevens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
