Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Belser v. Alton et al
as 2:2014cv13848
Plaintiff:
Marvin Belser
Defendant:
Sarah Alton, Susan B. McCauley, Josh Buskirk and others
Crowell #144211 v. Borgerding et al
as 2:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Richard Crowell #144211
Defendant:
William Borgerding, Corizon, Inc. and Chung Oh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin Ragan v. Susan Wilson, et al
as 14-2054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN R. RAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN WILSON, N.P., LAWRENCE POMEROY and JEFFREY STEVIE
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM BORGERDING, CRAIG HUTCHISON, M.D. and others
Odom #161794 v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
Steven Odom #161794
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Jeffry C. Stieve, William Borgerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe O'Brien v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE O'BRIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH INC., WILLIAM BORGERDING, RMO and others
Dennis Hall v. Richard Dodman, et al
as 14-1109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD DODMAN, RN and WILLIAM BORGERDING, DO, RMO
Roger Lewis v. G. Pramstaller, et al
as 13-2262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. PRAMSTALLER, Medical Director and WILLIAM BORGERDING, named as WM. Borgerding , Regional Medical Official
Lewis #225473 v. Pramstaller et al
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis #225473
Defendant:
G. J. Pramstaller and William Borgerding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien #484428 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joe O'Brien #484428
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Inc., William Borgerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kensu v. Buskirk et al
as 2:2013cv10279
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Joshua B Buskirk , Jeffrey C Stieve, Panjak Malik and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
