Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ANTHONY v. CHURCHWELL et al
as 5:2018cv00255
Defendant:
VILCHEZS, S LOWERY, JAMES KIRKLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Gould v. William Churchwell, et al
as 17-13075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GOULD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, WARDEN NWFRC, J. HOLDEN, CAPT NWFRC, S. DUVALL, COL NWFRC and others
HOLLEY v. CHURCHWELL
as 5:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
HOLLEY WALTER
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, CHRISTOPHER CHRISTMAS and GAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. CREWS
as 5:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE WHEELER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, R SILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVAREZ v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ALVAREZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, CHARLES SEXTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURCH et al v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
SALLEE BURCH and ESTATE OF RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , WILLIAM CHURCHWELL and JEFFERY POPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORDOVANO v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE P CORDOVANO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHWEST FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER ANNEX, MICHAEL D CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL GOULD V. WILLIAM CHURCHWELL et al
as 5:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GOULD
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, J HOLDEN, S DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Viera v. North West Florida Reception C
as 13-11626
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO VIERA
Respondent - Appellee:
NORTH WEST FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER, William Churchwell, Warden
James Cramer v. Jorge Aguliar, et al
as 12-15617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MELVIN CRAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGE AGULIAR, Medical Doctor, WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, PAGE ARMAND SMITH, Doctor, Ward Superivor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
