Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hicks v. The Cadle Company et al
as 1:2011mc00078
Plaintiff:
Kerry R. Hicks
Defendant:
The Cadle Company, Buckeye Retirement Co., LLC., LTD, William E. Shaulis and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Hicks v. Cadle
as 10-1575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL C. CADLE
Defendant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD. and WILLIAM E. SHAULIS
HICKS v. THE CADLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010mc00365
Plaintiff:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., WILLIAM E. SHAULIS and others
Garnishee:
CITIZENS BANK OF EVANS CITY, COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF PA, GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN and others
Hicks v. Cadle Company et al
as 1:2009mc00007
Plaintiff:
Kerry R. Hicks
Defendant:
Cadle Company, Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd., William E. Shaulis and others
Hicks v. Cadle Company, et al
as 08-1435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., WILLIAM E. SHAULIS and others
Hicks v. The Cadle Company, et al
as 08-1429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant - Appellant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD. and WILLIAM E. SHAULIS
Defendant:
DANIEL C. CADLE
Hicks v. Cadle Company, et al
as 08-1307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL C. CADLE
Defendant:
BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., WILLIAM E. SHAULIS and THE CADLE COMPANY
Hicks v. Cadle Company, et al
as 08-1306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant - Appellant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD. and WILLIAM E. SHAULIS
Defendant:
DANIEL C. CADLE
Hicks v. Bank of America, N.A, et al
as 05-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A
Defendant - Appellant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., WILLIAM E. SHAULIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
