Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Grant et al v. Kingston et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rae Grant, Jenny Kingston, Jana Nicole Johnson and others
Defendant:
Paul Elden Kingston, John Daniel Kingston, Sr, Hyrum Dalton Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson-Moffet v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
William Johnson-Moffet
Defendant:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
Scott William Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Havens v. Johnson
as 14-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL L. HAVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Williams Oliver v. Danforth Hines et al
as 1:2012mc00040
Plaintiff:
Jane Williams Oliver
Defendant:
Charleyrene Danforth Hines , Patricia D'Rene Danforth Lethgo , Mary Kate Williams Johnson and others
Objector:
Larry Lethgo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Federal Uniformed Services Employment/Re-Employment Act
Johnson v. EI Dupont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
EI Dupont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Havens v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darrell Havens
Defendant:
William (I) Johnson , William Johnson , Marks (I) Mantych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson Marts et al v. Lovelace Health System, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00734
Plaintiff:
Edwina Johnson Marts and William Johnson
Defendant:
Lovelace Health System, Inc. , Ardent Health Services, Inc. and Robert McVeety, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
