Cases 11 - 20 of 21
DANIELS v. BONDI et al
as 4:2014cv00392
Petitioner:
DALE CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, JR
Respondent:
PAMELA JO BONDI, LARRY CAMPBELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nimmons v. Pate et al
as 6:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Cline Nimmons
Defendant:
Tena Pate, Michael Crews, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. Herrera et al
as 1:2013cv23077
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Reilly
Defendant:
Guelsy M. Herrera, Eric Abrahamsen, Jennifer Christine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al
as 4:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
LAMAR LEON SCOTT
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, WILLIAM N MEGGS and TODD C HUNTER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDEN v. SCOTT
as 4:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDEN, JR
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, WILLIAM N MEGGS, NATHAN PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Griffin
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Peggy A. Quince, Edwin B. Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MEGGS
as 4:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
JEFF ADAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM N MEGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v. MEGGS et al
as 4:2008cv00127
Petitioner:
ALBERT NEWMAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM N MEGGS, R FRED SEULIS, LARRY CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEWMAN v. MEGGS
as 4:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
ALBERT NEWMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM N MEGGS, OWEN B MCCAUL and BARBARA PARENTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIMMONS v. MCCOLLUM et al
as 4:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE CLINE NIMMONS
Defendant:
BILL MCCOLLUM, CHARLIE CRIST, R FRED LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
