Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02217
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILLIAM RAMIREZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08564
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TANTON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TANTON, MARK BAILEY, ANDREW ITO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Ramirez v. TD DANS CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv20820
Plaintiff:
William Ramirez
Defendant:
TD DANS CORP. and Sergio Dans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smith v. Ramirez Velazquez et al
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sierra Montana Smith
Defendant:
William Ramirez Velazquez, United States Border Patrol and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Joseph William Ramirez v. Clark
as 5:2021cv00513
Petitioner:
Joseph William Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Ramirez, et al v. County of El Dorado, et al
as 20-16786
Defendant / Appellee:
EL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES, ALEXIS SHAW, Animal Services Captain, REBECCA ARELLANO, Civil Clerk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY RAMIREZ and WILLIAM RAMIREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
