Cases 11 - 20 of 129
Watson v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Kedria D. Watson
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Maestas v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mr. Beau Maestas
Defendant:
Warden Gittere, William Reubart and J Verde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Tristan et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Tristan, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayala v. Pickens et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Ayala
Defendant:
Pickens, Chet Rigney, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Crowder et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Crowder, David Drummond and William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris, Tavete Letoi, Rafael Bonet and others
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Mr. James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Sherman v. Harold Wickham, et al
as 23-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
HAROLD WICKHAM, KIM THOMAS, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Vaca v. Reubart
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Juan Vaca
Defendant:
William Reubart, Curtis Rigney and Michael Stolks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
