Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rathbun v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
William Scott Rathbun
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Veterans Health Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedford, et al v. Nowlin, et al
as 20-7070
Defendant / Appellant:
MARY NOWLIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONDRA N. PACE, WILLIAM SCOTT BEDFORD and RAY H. PACE
Defendant:
THE HELEN AND MARY NOWLIN IRREVOCABLE COMMON LAW TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1927
Collins et al v. Grey Hawk Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00869
Plaintiff:
Sarah Collins and William Scott Collins
Defendant:
Ernesto Dominguez and Grey Hawk Transportation, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Ironclad Energy Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. U.S. Bancorp
as 2:2020cv02310
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp
Plaintiff:
Markela Jones, Jennifer Jackson, Albert McGaha and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
