Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
United States of America v. Jenning
as 12-3959
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carl L. Cowley, AKA Donald Cowley, Jr., Khan R. Jennings, Maritza R. Rodriguez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Jennings, AKA Khan R. Jennings, AKA Paul, AKA Paul Ride, AKA Paul Jennings
Sharp v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 8:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sharp v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Jenning
as 12-545
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carl L. Cowley, AKA Donald Cowley, Jr., Khan R. Jennings, Maritza R. Rodriguez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Jennings, AKA Khan R. Jennings, AKA Paul, AKA Paul Ride, AKA Paul Jennings
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
William Sharpe, et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 11-4191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SHARPE and TAMMY SHARPE
Defendant - Appellee:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Sharpe et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2011cv00926
Plaintiff:
William Sharpe and Tammy Sharpe
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-465
Appellee USA:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHARP v. SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv07471
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHARP
Defendant:
SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. and SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
