Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Walden et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04641
Plaintiff:
Virgil Walden, Jr. , Ronald Thompson , James Herring and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tristen Pilato et al v. Joshua Rhodes et al
as 2:2012cv00438
Defendant:
Does, Michael Hamilton, Michael Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Tristen Pilato and William Thomas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coats v. McDonald
as 2:2011cv02028
Petitioner:
William Thomas Coats
Respondent:
Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. US Marshals Service
as 3:2010cv02662
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Myers
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOAH et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 2:2010cv08825
Plaintiff:
Ganir Aguilar, Reynalda Alvarez, Mayberry Alzona and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank
Elmore v. Federal Credit Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv02639
Plaintiff:
Tracy Elmore
Defendant:
Federal Credit Corp., William Thomas Engle, Jr., Experian Information Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Elmore v. Federal Credit Corp. et al
as 4:2010cv02639
Plaintiff:
Tracy Elmore
Defendant:
Federal Credit Corp., William Thomas Engle, Jr., Experian Information Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Toney v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2010cv00405
Plaintiff:
Stephen Toney
Defendant:
Victor Ruiz, Julie Hyride Marolli, Truong Ta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
