Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,581
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: MICHELLE GUTHRIE
Defendant: BOBBY MCCALLUM, GERARD WILLIAMS and SAM QUINCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Marston v. Bellsouth Communications LLC
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: Scott William Marston
Defendant: Bellsouth Communications LLC
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff: William Stephen Hall
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eli Porter, et al v. Derrell Thigpen, et al
as 24-11373
Plaintiff: ELI PORTER, MICHAEL SINGLETON, TIMOTHY VAN BEVERHOUDT and others
Defendant: DERRELL THIGPEN, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, MATT SOWELL, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, JONATHAN MALONE, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00745
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Cuyler v. Charles Wilson, et al
as 24-11219
Plaintiff: JAMES M. CUYLER
Defendant: CHARLES R. WILSON, WILLIAM H. PRYOR, JR., ADALBERTO JORDAN and others
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff: Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant: Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?