Cases 41 - 50 of 4,575
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lundie v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Nicole Lundie
Defendant:
William Roberts, II
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Josiah Colon, et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosiv, et al
as 24-10897
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH COLON, BRANDON KLING, ERIC MELE and others
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
New South Media Group, LLC, et al v. Rainbow City, Alabama, City Of
as 24-10895
Plaintiff:
NEW SOUTH MEDIA GROUP, LLC, DEVERICK WILLIAMS, WILLIAM D. WILSON and others
Defendant:
RAINBOW CITY, ALABAMA, CITY OF
Moon v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Debra Moon
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, Sherry Briggs, Marcus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. LEO
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
LAVETTE M WRIGHT
Defendant:
MAXIE WILLIAM LEO, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
