Cases 21 - 30 of 642
Gray v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Gray
Defendant:
Officer J Williams #1958F, Officer Diaz and Officer J Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Scott Bunnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
RAMSEY v. THOMAS
as 1:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMSEY
Defendant:
JAMSE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Vottero v. Sirocky et al
as 2:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kyle Vottero
Defendant:
John Siroky, Sue I. Lynch, Deb Podgorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nail v. Tarlton et al
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
David William Nail and David W Nail
Defendant:
Scott Lee Tarlton and Brent Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Violation of Emerg Med Treatment & Active Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holloway v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Courtney Holloway
Defendant:
City of South Bend, Officer Alexander Williams, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
