Cases 31 - 40 of 655
Robinson v. Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Robinson
Defendant:
Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Jeffrey Kepler and Jerry Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kurtz v. Burns
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Deloris Kurtz
Defendant:
William J. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Del Toro
as 3:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
William David Jones
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Defendant:
Carlos del Toro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Williams v. Nedelka et al
as 2:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Carla Williams
Defendant:
Michelle Nedelka, Vishwa Patel and Joseph Frenkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burress et al v. Premier Automotive Inc
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Burress and William Burress
Defendant:
Premier Automotive Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
