Cases 1 - 10 of 1,134
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William E. White, Jr.
Defendant:
Houchens Food Group, Inc. and Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Juanita Williams
Defendant:
HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Silena M. Dean
Defendant:
Kimberly L. Williams, Lifestyle Trucking, Inc. and Concordant Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Fulghum et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Megan Fulghum and Mrs. Ousley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
