Cases 1 - 10 of 1,520
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodruff v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Woodruff
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Fountain, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
William Bart Huey
Defendant:
Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
